RADIO
Hello fellow RotoBallers! Sabermetrics have become an integral tool for fantasy baseball draft prep, but a concise resource for understanding the basics can be difficult to find.
This series attempts to define and explain all of the metrics fantasy owners may find useful, citing examples of how to use them in the process. Twenty degrees in applied mathematics are not required to use advanced metrics effectively, and this will be a no-math zone. We also won't bring in many of the metrics that are synonymous with advanced stats, most notably the fantasy-useless WAR, or Wins Above Replacement.
Instead, the focus will be on sabermetric statistics and ideas that are useful for predicting the standard stats the vast majority of leagues care about, such as batting average.
Be sure to check all of our fantasy baseball draft tools and resources:- Fantasy baseball draft kit
- Fantasy baseball rankings
- Team Sync platform and Draft Assistant
- Fantasy baseball mock draft simulator
- Fantasy baseball draft cheat sheets
- Fantasy baseball closer depth charts
- Fantasy baseball prospects
BABIP for Hitters
The most accessible of the fantasy-relevant advanced stats is BABIP, or Batting Average on Balls In Play. It simply measures a player's batting average on balls in play, with outcomes such as strikeouts and home runs removed from consideration. In general, the league average hovers around .300, a nice round number to remember. Many know BABIP as an approximation of luck, with either a very high or very low number indicative of a major batting average regression in the future. That is partially correct--the stat can be used to predict batting average fluctuations. However, a player's skills may allow him to run a better than average BABIP, or doom him to a consistently below average figure. One example of this is Jose Altuve.
Altuve has been a fantasy force for a while now, but he took it to a new level with his MVP slash line of .346/.410/.547 in 2017. A .370 BABIP helped him compile those numbers, and Altuve loses a lot of value if we regress that all the way to .300. Should we really do that?
Altuve is an elite speedster--this is why he is known as a steals guy in the first place. It makes sense that someone with Altuve's wheels could beat out more base hits than other players, while most catchers would lag in this regard. Therefore, an established player's baseline BABIP should not be the league average .300, but whatever that specific player's career BABIP is. Altuve's career BABIP is .339, clearly indicating a sustainable ability to beat the league average .300. Of course, .339 is still a lot lower than the .370 figure from last year. If we assume Altuve can beat the average BABIP, how do we know if he was in fact lucky?
The answer is to look at BABIP by batted ball type. Altuve gets his speedster hits exclusively on grounders, as running really fast does nothing to prevent a fielder from catching a ball in the air. While the league averaged a .241 BABIP on grounders, Altuve posted a .339 mark on them last year. His career rate is only .296. Therefore, we can conclude that Altuve will continue to outperform the league average on ground balls because his .296 career BABIP is much higher than the league average. However, he is unlikely to do so to the same extent he did in 2017.
Comparing BABIPs by batted-ball type year over year, Altuve also benefited from more fortunate fly balls and line drives in 2017. His fly balls had a BABIP of .150 against a career mark of .129, while his line drives beat their career average by 10 points (.716 vs. .706). Regression should be expected to reduce Altuve's BABIP toward his career .339 rate, but he still projects to beat the league average mark of .300 by a considerable margin.
The same trend is possible in a negative way. For example, Anaheim's slugging DH, Albert Pujols, is well known for being an all-or-nothing batter that pulls the ball at every opportunity. This makes him susceptible to the shift, as the infield defense knows where the ball is likely to go and can set up accordingly. He also lacks the speed to beat out infield hits most other major leaguers can, finishing dead last in Statcast's Sprint Speed metric last year. These factors figure to hurt his BABIP on grounders, and Pujols's .192 last year indicates that it did. In 2016, it was .217, and in 2015 it was .179.
Clearly, projecting regression toward the league average would be wrong, as his pull tendencies and subpar speed allow the defense to consistently perform better than average against him. Pujols's overall BABIP was .249 last year, a number that should be expected moving forward due to his consistently poor production on ground balls.
To conclude, BABIP can be used to indirectly measure a player's batting average luck by comparing it not to the league average of .300 but to an established player's career number. Foot speed, batted ball authority, LD%, and defensive positioning all give players some ability to manipulate BABIP. Players with these skills may still overachieve, and this regression can be predicted by examining BABIP by batted ball type. Younger players without an established baseline are generally regressed to the league average, but these predictions are less reliable than those based on a player's personal history. Next time, we'll look at a stat called the BABIP of power, HR/FB.
